In my not very humble opinion. Yesterday was Earth Day and this ??????? was in the local paper. I guess I should be glad they didn't put a link on the Guard's website.I can't find much about the author on the web that isn't linked to the institute's website. And Wickipedia's entry is such an obvious puff piece I'm not even bothering to put in the link.
To say this essay is totally off base is putting it mildly. And he totally ignores the fact that caring for the environment isn't limited to Judeo Christian belief. In fact right wingers like Pat Robertson usually consign environmentalists to the nether world of pagan, tree hugging, earth worshippers.
EARTH DAY'S ENVIRONMENTAL RELIGION
By ROBERT H. NELSON
With Earth Day fast approaching (April 22), Americans might want to consider how environmentalism is becoming a new form of religion. They also might want to ask: Why is it OK to teach environmental religion in public schools, while the teaching of Judaism, Christianity and other traditional religions is not constitutionally permitted?
Environmentalism has, indeed, become an article of religious faith. As Joel Garreau, a former Washington Post editor, wrote in 2010, "faith-based environmentalism increasingly sports saints, sins, prophets, predictions, heretics, sacraments and rituals."
Some argue that a religion must have a God, disqualifying environmentalism. Yet, as the great American psychologist and philosopher William James observed in his 1902 classic, "The Varieties of Religious Experience," it is not necessary to "positively assume a God" in order to have a religion. James insisted that "godless or quasi-godless creeds" also can qualify as religions, which - given its devout belief system and the fervor of its adherents - clearly would include today's environmentalism.
Paul Tillich, the greatest American theologian of the 20th century, similarly defined religion as a comprehensive belief system that seeks to answer questions of "ultimate concern" to human existence. For Tillich, it was characteristic of our time that "the most important religious movements are developing outside of (official) religion."
The U.S. Supreme Court endorsed such an understanding of religion in the 1960s. In a 1965 decision in the case known as United States v. Seeger, involving the requirements for a conscientious objector exemption from the military draft, the Court ruled that the exemption should be applied equally to those who believe in a Supreme Being and those "with a sincere and meaningful belief which occupies in the life of its possessor a place parallel to that filled by the God" of religious believers.
Even as it adopts secular forms, environmentalism borrows to a surprising degree from Jewish and Christian history.
For example, it says in Deuteronomy that, for those who worship false idols, God "will send disease among you ... fever, infections, plague and war.... (and) will blight your crops." In 2010, Al Gore similarly foresaw environmental sinners headed toward calamity on a biblical scale, facing rising seas, "stronger and more destructive" hurricanes and droughts "getting longer and deeper."
In contemporary environmentalism, the largest religious debts are owed to Calvinism. It was John Calvin who wrote that God has "revealed himself and daily discloses himself in the whole workmanship of the universe." For both Calvin and environmentalism, the natural world is the artwork of God, the Creation.
Man's role is to conserve God's work. Thus, the rituals of environmentalism celebrate reduced consumption lowering the heat, driving fewer miles, using less water, living in smaller houses, having fewer children. Limiting human appetites, rather than satisfying ever-growing demands, is the environmental command.
As prominent an environmentalist as David Brower, who served as executive director of the Sierra Club for 18 years, has described human existence as a terrible "cancer" destroying God's good Creation. Being environmentally "born again" was for Brower and many other environmentalists the only good answer to modern man's environmental corruption and sinfulness.
The issue posed by environmentalism today for those who believe in the separation of church and state is the following: Does it make sense constitutionally to prohibit the teaching and embrace of Judaism and Protestantism in official public settings, while permitting the government establishment - as taught in the public schools - of this new secularized Protestantism: the religion of green, the religion of Earth Day.
ABOUT THE WRITER
Robert H. Nelson is a professor of environmental policy at the University of Maryland and a senior fellow with The Independent Institute, 100 Swan Way, Oakland, Calif. 94621; website: www.independent.org. He is the author of "The New Holy Wars: Economic Religion versus Environmental Religion in Contemporary America."
This essay is available to McClatchy-Tribune News Service subscribers. McClatchy-Tribune did not subsidize the writing of this column; the opinions are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of McClatchy-Tribune or its editors.
I much prefer the Lakota saying. "We don't own the earth we borrow it from our children."